Reliability And Validity

Running Head : NameUniversityCourseTutorDateNormally when a survey and look into is carried come out the results should be evidenceed to prove whether they argon valid and coercive . Therefore I have come out with the necessitate responses to judge the following educatees aggrieve or rightbookman number ally has no concrete moods on what asperity and dependability vanquish matter . In the first place validity is non intellectal but objective . For the response to be valid the results should be seen to be working and practical . Reliability according to pupil one is a little bit applicable and I cigarette therefore accept it . He /she argues out right that comparing the responses of groups pools and relating the accuracy of the out comers can achieve reliability . However one thing that has been ignored is that for the response of this scholarly person to be reliable then it should be make repeatedly is when comparisons on the accuracy can be done . bookman one has not got the exact recalling of validity since a submit is only valid when it has been tested and the results or end is current . This is always done at some levels of say-so interval . One cannot just pass a judgment that given information is valid before testing the resultsFor the import assimilator reliability is properly defined and explained For a data to be reliable automatically the test result should be self-consistent . Student two also has a graphic idea on validity . A good test it verbalize to reliable and valid if it is consistent and quantifys exactly what it tends to whole forest . I believe that the results that the students go outing get from the use of the shed light on eating index as a tool on the changing quality of nutrient intake for 9th grade unmanful athletes at the love joy high school give be acceptedThe t! hird student is a bright statistician as he /she uses a lot of statistics to express his sagacity .

Results of a test will be reliable when they ar consistent . Consistency is achieved after several(prenominal) repetitions of the test are done . His /her reaction on validity is also authorise . The research measurement tool should only measure what it purports to measure . The distinguishable types of validity are also discussed clearly by this studentStudent 4 is completely mixed up on differentiating the enclosure validity and reliability . Basically validity is not whether or not the research explains or measures what he /she said he would be measuring . The validity should be based on the circumstance that the test should measure exactly what it is to measure . again for results to be reliable they should be consistent after several experiments performed . You can use an instrument that gives accurate results but this doesn t mean that the results will be reliable . His findings on the course course of study may be misleading or not certain(p) in the long runThe fifth student is also incorrectly on the way he responds to validity and reliability . His argument...If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay